Choose TackTime if
Choose TackTime if your hours become invoices and audit exhibits, you need each project manager to approve their own hours, and you refuse to run monitoring software on your people.
TackTime vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff tracks people: screenshots, activity percentages, GPS. TackTime tracks commitments: a weekly record your team writes, closes, and stands behind. Both produce timesheets. Only one produces a team that trusts them.
Choose honestly
Choose Hubstaff if
Choose Hubstaff if you manage field crews who need GPS clock-in, or you bill clients on screenshot proof of work and your team has accepted that trade.
The structural difference
Hubstaff's model needs a timer running and a desktop agent watching: screenshots up to three per ten minutes, a keyboard-and-mouse activity percentage, app and URL logs. Hubstaff will tell you these are optional and configurable. TackTime's answer is different in kind: the capture features do not exist in our product. There is no setting to audit, no policy to trust, nothing to turn off.
What monitoring does to teams is documented rather than hypothetical. A worker required to install Hubstaff on her personal computer told NPR in 2020 that it "has really destroyed morale for everyone." In July 2025, xAI directed its contract tutors to install Hubstaff on personal laptops, and after employees threatened to resign the company was reported to have revisited the mandate. Reviewers on Capterra, writing as managers, call the activity scoring intrusive and unfair to keyboard-heavy work.
The approval difference
Hubstaff gates timesheet approvals (Team tier and above, $10 per seat per month billed annually or $12 billed monthly), and approval there is a payroll gate for the whole timesheet rather than a routing system. TackTime is designed so that each project's hours route to that project's manager independently, on the one seat price: $8 per seat per month billed annually, or $10 billed monthly.
The audit difference
Hubstaff publishes a DCAA guide; publishing a guide is not a timekeeping model. DCAA-oriented practice wants contemporaneous, self-recorded entries with justified corrections and supervisor accountability, which is TackTime's entire design. A pile of screenshots and an activity graph answers none of what an auditor asks.
Side by side, as of 2026-09-01
| Difference | TackTime | Hubstaff |
|---|---|---|
| Time entry | Deliberate weekly grid, daily close | Desktop timer with activity capture |
| Audit history | Complete revision history on every entry | Screenshot gallery and edit logs |
| Approvals | Yes, by design: each project portion routes to its own manager | Team tier and above, $10 per seat per month billed annually or $12 billed monthly |
| Surveillance | None; the features do not exist | Screenshots, activity percentage, app and URL logs, GPS |
| Price | $8 per seat per month billed annually, or $10 billed monthly | $4.99 to $10 per seat per month billed annually across the published tiers; Enterprise is custom priced; 2-seat minimum on paid plans |
| Trial | 60 days | 14 days |
What Hubstaff does well
GPS and geofencing genuinely serve field-service crews, and the payroll integration list is long. If your business is trucks and job sites rather than projects and invoices, it is built for that.
Sources, read on 2026-09-01
- Hubstaff pricing and plans
- Hubstaff per-seat pricing
- Hubstaff pricing page
- NPR, "Your Boss Is Watching You" (2020-05-13)
- Benzinga on the xAI mandate (July 2025)
- Hubstaff reviews on Capterra
- Hubstaff on screenshot frequency
- Hubstaff on DCAA timekeeping
TackTime supports a DCAA-oriented timekeeping process and is not a certification, an attestation, or a guarantee of compliance; how your organization configures and uses it decides the outcome.
Sixty days to see what a trusted record looks like.
Every workspace begins with a 60-day trial of the full product. You will sign in with your work identity first, then name the company and the address the workspace answers on.